A Place of Greater Safety? Securing Judgement in International Ethics

TitleA Place of Greater Safety? Securing Judgement in International Ethics
Publication TypeBook Chapter
Year of Publication2013
AuthorsHutchings, Kimberly, Amanda Russell Beattie, and Kate Schick
Pagination25-42
PublisherPalgrave Macmillan UK
CityLondon
ISBN Number978-1-137-29214-8
AbstractTo be vulnerable is to be able to be wounded, painfully transformed from the outside, in ways over which one has no control. Nussbaum points out that in a tradition of normative thinking going back to the Stoics, acknowledgement of vulnerability is the enemy of good judgement (Nussbaum 2001: 19–88). The ideal of judgement is one in which self-sufficient reason alone holds sway. Within this tradition of thought, authority and invulnerability become bound together — the judgements you can trust are the judgements that are safe from the literal and metaphorical knives of the world. As other chapters in this volume demonstrate, this Stoic legacy, mediated through enlightenment rationalism, is influential in predominant responses to human vulnerability in international politics. Theoretical and policy-oriented explanations and prescriptions relating to inequity, injury, harm and suffering in the contemporary world anchor their authority in an ideal of invulnerable judgement, that is to say a judgement that may be mistaken but cannot be wounded.
URLhttps://doi.org/10.1057/9781137292148_2
Short TitleA Place of Greater Safety?
Collection: