Professor Kim Fortun | Anthropology | University of California Irvine

Detailed Seminar Schedule

Archive Ethnography is an emerging, experimental way to produce, curate, communicate and politically activate ethnographic knowledge. It involves the curation of purposefully diverse data for an ethnographer’s own analysis and interpretation; it enables collaborations with other ethnographers, with researchers in other disciplines and with the people and systems  ethnographers study (with special interest in their data practices and infrastructures); it is mindful of its own encoded ideology and enables many different forms of ethnographic expression and engagement. 

In this seminar, we’ll work collaboratively to advance both the theory and practice of archive ethnography. Our work will have two streams: We’ll read widley to curate a set of critical concepts that can underpin and direct the development of archive ethnography.  We’ll also play with possibilities for the design, building and activation of ethnographic archives, collections, exhibits and installations.  Through a series of sketching exercises, seminar participants will design and begin to develop their own ethnographic archives and exhibits, in process considering their data types and preservation plans, privacy and security concerns, copyright issues, and the politics and poetics of their own data infrastructure. 

Each week, seminar participants will annotate two or more articles|chapters that will help us refine and articulate concepts relevant to archive ethnography -- with options so that readings can sync with participants’ varied interests.  Each week, seminar participants will also work on and share a cluster of sketches through which they assess and creatively plan for the archive needs and potentials of their own projects (current and future).  Annotations and sketches should be shared by Tuesdays at noon so that there is time for others in the seminar to review in advance of our meeting on Thursday.  We’ll set up a rotation so that these reviews are shared among the group. Please plan on this schedule. In early December, seminar participants will share draft designs of their own ethnographic archive, detailing a number of collections that will be built and a plan for an ethnographic installation or exhibit. 

Our seminar meetings will be used as an opportunity to draw our varied insights together, digitally formatted in ways that can support archive ethnography going forward.  This will be an experiment in what can be called seminar archiving.  During seminar meetings, we’ll discuss an array of concepts -- and how they should best be named -- supporting archive ethnography.  We’ll read across various texts to refine key concepts, practicing collaborative hermeneutics (itself a key concept). We’ll sketch together to build our capacity to design ethnographic archives, collections, exhibits and installations.  And we’ll lay the ground needed to sketch your own ethnographic archive. 

The success of the seminar will depend on a deeply collaborative approach to the seminar itself,  generous cooperation among participants, openness to diverse ideas, and the creative patience needed to help paradigms and methods shift.  We’ll work together to scaffold these. 

SCHEDULE

September 30 Archive Ethnography: What? Why? How? 

October 7 Substantive Logics (Why Archive?)

October 14 Archives and Collections: Logics & Designs 

October 21 Exhibits and Installations: Logics and Designs 

October 28 Designing and Building Archives and Collections

November 4 Designing and Building Exhibits and Installations

November 11 Holiday (Veterans Day)

November 18 Infrastructuring and Governing Archives

November 25 Holiday (Thanksgiving)

December 2 Archives, Collections, Exhibits, Installations: Presentations  

December 9 Archives, Collections, Exhibits, Installations: Presentations 

Substantive Logics (Why Archive?)

MurphyA et al 2021 Ethnography in an Information Age

Alexandra K. Murphy, Colin Jerolmack, DeAnna Smith. Ethnography, Data Transparency, and the Information Age. Annual Review of Sociology 2021 47:1, 41-61. ...Read more

AdemaJ 2021 Publishing as a Relational Practice IN Living Books

Adema, Janneke. “Publishing as a Relational Practice: Radical Open Access and Experimentation,” Living Books. (~45p, with many images)Read more

Archive Logics and Power

ZietlynD 2012 Anthropology in and of the Archives

David Zietlyn's critical anthropological analysis of anthropology and/in archives. Read more

Poole, Alex H. 2020. “The Information Work of Community Archives: A Systematic Literature Review.”

Poole, Alex H. 2020. “The Information Work of Community Archives: A Systematic Literature Review.”Read more

Andrew, F., Stevens, M. and Shepherd, E. (2009). “Whose Memories, Whose Archives? Independent Community Archives, Autonomy and the Mainstream.”

Andrew, F., Stevens, M. and Shepherd, E. (2009). “Whose Memories, Whose Archives? Independent Community Archives, Autonomy and the Mainstream.” Archival Science 9 (1): 71. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-009-9105-2.Read more

KleinL 2013 The Image of Absence: Archival Silence, Data Visualization, and James Hemings

Klein, Lauren F. 2013. “The Image of Absence: Archival Silence, Data Visualization, and James Hemings.” American Literature 85 (4): 661–88. https://doi.org/10.1215/00029831-2367310...Read more

MauthnerN GardosJ 2015 Archival Practices the Making of "Memories"

Mauthner, Natasha and Judit Gárdos. 2015. “Archival Practices and the Making of “Memories”, New Review of Information Networking, 20:1-2, 155-169, https://doi.org/10.1080/13614576.2015.1114825

 Read more

EichhornK 2013 The Archival Turn in Feminism: Outrage in Order

Eichhorn, Kate. 2013. The Archival Turn in Feminism: Outrage in Order. Temple University Press.Read more

CaswellM et al 2016 To Suddenly Discover Yourself Existing: Uncovering the Impact of Community Archives

Caswell, Michelle, Marika Cifor, and Mario H. Ramirez. 2016. “"To Suddenly Discover Yourself Existing”: Uncovering the Impact of Community Archives.” The American Archivist 79 (1): 56–81.Read more

Exhibits and Installations: Logics and Designs

VidaliD & PhillipsP 2020 Ethnographic Installation and 'The Archive'

Vidali, Debra and Kwame Phillips. 2020. “Ethnographic Installation and “The Archive,” Visual Anthropology Review. Read more

Kim Gallon Making a Case for the Black Digital Humanities

Gallon, Kim. 2016. “Debates in the Digital Humanities: Making a Case for the Black Digital Humanities,” 2–7.Read more

RizzoM 2018 Black Digital Humanities Syllabus

Syllabus for course offered at Rutgers by Mary Rizzo, Director of Public and Digital Humanities Initiatives. Read more

BishopC 2014 Artificial Hells Interview

Bishop, C. 2014. Artificial Hells: A Conversation with Claire Bishop. Interview by Madeline Eschenburg. Contemporaneity:  Historical Presence in Visual Culture. Vol 3, No 1 (2014) | ISSN 2155-1162 (online) | DOI 

http://...Read more

BishopC 2012 Artificial Hells: Participatory Art and the Politics of Spectatorship

Artificial Hells is the first historical and theoretical overview of socially engaged participatory art, known in the US as “social practice.” Claire Bishop follows the trajectory of twentieth-century art and examines key moments in the development of a participatory aesthetic. Read more

Gold, M., &; Klein, L. (2016). Making a Case for the Black Digital Humanities. In Debates in the Digital Humanities. essay, University of Minnesota Press.

Gold, M., &; Klein, L. (2016). Making a Case for the Black Digital Humanities. In Debates in the Digital Humanities. essay, University of Minnesota Press.Read more